WHO – wait, what? What is it? Slow down.
No, no, no. Hold up. This review is not your usual Pirate Slut write-up, with the customary detailed and convincing explanations as to why the music I have stolen and listened to is worth all your whiles. It’s not going to gently chide you for your skepticism, nor plead that you just show some sympathy where there’s usually none. It does not follow the same format. No self-asked questions, at least. Because this is not just a review of an album. It is a review of two albums. And it is not just a review. It’s a question. And that question is, “what’s so great about an attitude??” Also, it’s an answer. It’s all those things.

Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavilion

Taylor Swift - Speak Now
The way these albums came together was by as random a chance as my Ipod usually throws at me. Simply put: the New York City subway is a place where you don’t make eye contact, where you don’t always get to sit and hunch into yourself, and on which you just can’t wait for the ride to end (I make an exception for the elevated trains, which never stop feeling like they’re scored with poignant music and that I’m on the way to something grand like a spike in the narrative arc, and when it pops out of the darkness into sunlight or even overcastlight, oh man, it’s like 3 minutes and 40 seconds into this). The time I spend the most on the train is usually the morning commute, where I try to blot out any lingering anxiety (re: the next nine hours, did I eat enough breakfast?, wait this jacket’s not buttoned right, oh damn I left my GLASSES ON THE DAMN NIGHTSTAND) with some new, hopefully distracting, optimally transcendent new music. And since Taylor Swift’s new album “Speak Now” was available, it so became part of this routine.
The Animal Collective album came about by the vague feeling that I, like the rest of the bloggerati, should check this band out. Hype, hype, hype. But when E.A. frustratingly revealed that he could at the least recommend TWO of their albums to start with, I shuffled Animal Collective down the list of Things I’d Be Best Served By Hearing Now Thank You (TIBBSBHNTY, pronounced the same way it sounds when you blow your nose and it goes through the tissue onto your hand). Then, in a snap decision (the best kind!), built on the chatter that promised this album to be pretty amazing and immediately accessible, onto the Ipod it went. I’d already heard one of the tunes off it, and I’ll be damned if it wasn’t propulsive enough for stoners and joggers alike!
The act of listening to each of these albums, though generated out of two disparate bundles of instinct and reaction, produced a question that’s been dripping away at me, stalagmite-like, and calcified into one rising point of an idea. Specifically, analyzing an album (or artist or song)’s attitude, or Mood, as it relates to its Appeal.
When I say “Mood” I’m not talking about the mood that it provokes in the listener. That’s entirely subjective, with an exception or two. I mean the slightly less indefinable presentational Mood of the album or artist or song, the combined precipitate of the artist’s appearance in visual and popular media, the overall dynamics of the music, the shared lyrical and musical themes from song to song, and how it settles into popular culture, which can often trump all the other variables in determining the overall mood. See: “Born In The U.S.A.” may not be a stirring patriotic barnburner, but that’s just a flywing of a barrier in the way of you wanting to hoist the stars and stripes and start baking apple pies while scoring touchdowns once you hear that opening “dumBAAAAH NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH” salvo. Go ahead. Tell me I’m wrong.
But in the context of “Speak Now” and “Merriweather Post Pavillion”, both albums are by artists who, though still recent additions to American popular music, have become somewhat entrenched in their respective niches. Animal Collective is ten years gone in producing music, and its members’ solo projects makes yearly top 10 lists in independent and alternative music press. Taylor Swift is twenty, and has only been around on the scene for 4 years, yet by now is a household name, and a car-driving-past-you-blasting favorite. She is pretty, and writes her own songs. They are arty and produce dense and experimental music. She has won a Grammy award. Your 17 year old cousin who can’t wait to graduate and who has plans for a tattoo on his wrist that a watch can easily cover but only so his parents won’t freak, well, he swigged cough syrup and went to their show and it was fucking blindass amazing.
I don’t mean to try to say “they’re actually so much alike because all music has appeal so therefore all fans are alike and all music is alike all one! all one!” like some insane writing on a Dr. Bronner’s bottle or like someone trying a little to hard to be interesting (ahem.) But check Taylor Swift, and her new album in all its glory and sheen. Her songs ripple with a mood of childhood innocence shot through with the increasing desperation of a romantic hooked on her own heartbreak. And that can be a criticism some level at her, specifically this person I work with who stomped her foot and went “dammit, why is she making millions off of songs that are basically my Livejournal from six years ago?!” And that’s the Mood right there: a young girl with a guitar and, at times, an orchestra. Though Swift wrote each song on the new album, Nathan Chapman produces the fuck out of them and sands down each possible corner and snag until each song’s like the sonic equivalent of a design student’s apartment. Guitars chime in symmetry, drums lay down a rhythm steady enough to do brain surgery on, vocal overdubs are weaved together and mixed loud enough so even a stadium designated chorus like that of the first single, “Mine” (which explodes into “do you remember we were standing there by the water?/you put your arm around me for the first time!”) You ask: “is that good?” And I say: “somehow yes.” Because Taylor Swift’s voice is a little shrill. A little pinched. A little nasal. And some places on the record it ominously carries an almost autotunedly slipperiness. It would all seem soulless, were it not for the fact that the album’s intense accessibility is only one part of the Mood.
Animal Collective’s album is the musical equivalent of walking through snow-covered woods wondering when you’re going to step through ice and plunge into icy water, and whether or not that’ll be a bad thing. To explain: their music is noisy. Lots of sampled beats and synthesizer washes, echoey vocals, pounding beats. Gurgling, warm-yet-robotic music. Now, I’ve been told that this album sounds like this because their usual guitar player was taking a break from recording, so the three remaining members, Noah Lennox who calls himself Panda Bear, David Portner who calls himself Avey Tare, and Brian Weitz who calls himself Geologist, hit up the sampler and keyboard store. Bleeps and bloops abound, and for all the supposed pop accessibility of “Merriweather Post Pavillion”, it would almost seem like three guys who look like your barista who make music that sounds like they’re on drugs because, let’s face it, it’s weird and they’re young, would be undeserving of all the acclaim. But, of course, all that’s only part of the Mood.
There’s sound, there’s image, and the two together make Mood. Taylor Swift’s sound is one of pop songcraft and lyrical similarity, major keys and earnest delivery. Her image, at least now, is one of sweetness tempered with the pressure of fame, and the awareness of romantic convention yet a swooning draw to it, a context where her real-life dalliance with singer-songwriter John Mayer becomes a dreamy lament about “someone” (scare quotes mine) who should have known that “19 was too young to be messed with”, yet where cynicism and nastiness are not even part of the equation. Love is a candy-coated battlefield. Distilled, that all sounds like this. If you dislike that type of vulnerability, or believe in fact that it’s simply calculated to sell downloads and tickets and not genuine like the way it was when it happened to you, when he gradually let you leave yourself vulnerable until it was too much to scramble back from him and you were left raw and fucked up, when you felt human emotions, then yeah, you’ll turn up your nose to Ms. Swift’s Mood. Her tossed off spoken “next chapter!” on “The Story Of Us”, which describes a relationship’s declining narrative, will sound cheesy. “Better Than Revenge”, where she she states that a romantic rival’s “better known for the things that does on the mattress…whoa-oah!” and the comparison of stealing a boyfriend to “stealing other people’s toys on the playground” will induce cringes rather than jaw-set fist-pumps. The sighing ballads of “Back To December” and “Innocent” will leave you groaning, not nodding. She’s too…just…ugh for you to like. You are locking the door at the base of a staircase to a smile when you do this. So if that is how you choose to live your life, have no illusions: you’re being anti-happy. And you’re not responding the cultural paradigm she exists in. You are not somehow seeing beyond the phoniness. You’re responding to her Mood. Reacting, to be more accurate. Being reactionary, to be more and more accurate.
Similarly, Animal Collective, if written off as pretentious, overly concerned with its own inscrutable knotted musical logic, or indulgent, on “Merriweather Post Pavillion”, is a reaction to their and its Mood, which is so much more than the weird psychedelic graffiti scrawled on its surface, which is what anyone who refuses to give a listen is threatened by. “Don’t go in there! That’s gang territory!” Silly of you to be so withheld! Whether it’s the pathos exhibited on “My Girls” (dude just wants to take care of his wife and daughter) or “Summertime Clothes” (dude just wants to have a constructive messy-fun summer, “We’ll dance to the songs from the cars as they pass/Weave through the cardboard, smell that trash/Walking around in our summertime clothes/Nowhere to go while our bodies glow”), or the jaw-harp (or digeridoo?) skittery psychedelia of “Lion In A Coma”, this music is a bright burble of unstructured minds and a loose set of jaws let loose with keyboards. Even the slower tracks like the album’s parade of a first track, “In The Flowers”, are full-steam-ahead with their fucked up ideas of how a pop song sounds, and can shift from ethereal to rollercoaster in a way that’s only accommodating if you accept the Mood for what it is. And if it takes drugs to make that happen, find a babysitter and let rip, dammit. Band is a bunch of scruffy white boys. Band meets samplers. Band finds success in experimentalism. Is Animal Collective “rock”? “pop”? “Experimental” (which is code for “never heard anything like this before, fuck it, whatever”)? On this album, yes. Is Taylor Swift a confessional singer songwriter? A pure pop goose laying egg after golden egg? Only as country as bare emoting and lack of pretension to something beyond a faithful adherence to hers and others pop conventions allows? And yes I said yes she will, yes, be all those things. You can dance to both. It’ll just be in different venues, wearing different looking outfits.
Something to be said about the lyrics of both albums: this is Animal Collective, “Until fully grown/You got a real good shot/Won’t help to hold inside/Keep it real keep it real shout out.” And this is Taylor Swift, “It could stay this simple/No one’s ever burned/Nothing’s ever left you scarred/Even though you want to, just try to never grow up”.
So yeah.

Sleep well, readers.
November 3, 2010
Categories: Review . Tags: analog keyboards, Animal Collective, Avey Tare, country, Geologist, guitar, John Mayer, love story, Merriweather Post Pavilion, Nathan Chapman, Panda Bear, Pop, samplers, slick, Speak Now, strings, Taylor Lautner, Taylor Swift, vocal harmonies . Author: sisterpsychosis . Comments: 2 Comments